16. Redefining Realness by Janet Mock

21 Apr

Redefining Realness by Janet Mock

Janet Mock is a transgender woman who began her transition in high school and lived as a woman in New York City in her 20s, working media jobs. This is her memoir, and it’s a fascinating story, especially since it cleverly starts with Mock revealing her gender identity to her straight-man boyfriend, whose response the reader eagerly awaits for the next 300 pages.

Everyone’s lurid questions swirl around these issues—How would a straight man feel to discover he’d been sleeping with a former man?  Did Mock have an obligation to disclose? Can a transwoman really pass that effectively? And while the eventual answers are interesting, Mock’s story is much more than that, and she knows it, and uses the hot topics only as a frame.

Mock is half black, half Hawaiian and grew up in poverty bouncing between residences with a grandmother, a neglectful mother, a crack-addicted father and a cast of siblings, half-siblings and de facto step-siblings. She was sexually abused as a child, though she says her gender nonconformity came first. She makes a compelling case that contrary to the stereotype (that abuse causes gender dysphoria) the abuse was the result of her gender, since the abuser sensed she’d keep silent because of her difference.

Despite the obvious flaws of her family, Mock drew on their positive qualities, loved them, and used them for the support they were able to offer. Her gentle treatment of them shows true kindness of spirit. And, in a way, the multiple homes and not-so-benign neglect allowed her to take the reins with her gender in ways that a more policed young person would never have managed. (For example, she started taking off-label hormones and growing breasts in high school… and her mother didn’t notice.)

It’s a page-turner, and a great story.

The book and the generally excellent writing suffer, however, from the sense that Mock is trying to win a cultural argument for trans people through framing her life in the right way. She tends to spell out the political lessons of her experiences. Passages like the following are encrusted with lingo and feel like dogma 101:

The stories of my early expressions of femininity echo many people’s lived experiences with exploring, experimenting, and expressing gender. I’ve read and heard stories of trans people from all walks of life who remember playfully exhibiting their preferred gender behaviors and roles at age three or four without anyone’s prompting. …the majority were discouraged from experimenting outside their prescribed gender roles and behaviors. This contributes greatly to self image… Most cis people rarely question their gender identity…. This makes it difficult for the majority of people—including parents of trans youth and those close to trans people—to grasp the varied identities, needs, and determinations of trans people.

What’s the difference between a “lived experience” and an “experience”? What does “determination” mean in this context? Do we really know how parental discouragement of gender non-conforming behavior affects self-image, or is this a party line, a truism that everyone accepts because it seems to make sense? And “most cis people rarely question their gender identity”…. uhhhm, that’s probably not true, especially in childhood, whether you end up cis or end up trans. Most of this passage probably is accurate enough as common sense, but it has a false science-y quality that I object to.

I suppose the point is that the book is Dogma 101, Mock is quite specifically writing the book as a work of advocacy, using herself as an example to teach a general readership about trans issues.

The most interesting part of that to me was that as an advocate she struggles with the desire to pass as a woman (be a woman), as has been her deepest urge since childhood, verses the rising tide of calls to stand with her sister trans-women, which involves a fair amount of not-passing. It’s a conundrum and Mock doesn’t have the answers, but she has obviously responded to calls for her help with the same kind of generosity she has shown in other parts of her story. I admire her for it.

 

 

 

 

5 Responses to “16. Redefining Realness by Janet Mock”

  1. Grab the Lapels April 21, 2016 at 5:29 pm #

    I really want to read this one, and now you’ve brought it back to my awareness. Yes, that passage does sound very preachy. I’ve been listening to news stories about what it means to be trans in the media, and one thing people point out repeatedly is that unless you have the money and support to go all the way, the person’s appearance is going to be ridiculed, like they’re some sort of Frankenstein. For instance, Mock isn’t just trans, she’s gorgeous and sexy. Compare that to people who are trans but without any surgery or hormones, living by changing their clothes and hair because that’s what they can do. I would assume this book had an agenda because people like Mock, Laverne Cox, and even Caitlin Jenner are constantly being watched to teach cis people what to do. We ask stupid questions, like, “What are your genitals like?” Remember when that happened and Katie Couric was schooled by Cox? Couric didn’t mean anything by it, but because trans is out and being talked about, cis people (definitely me!) are catching up on something they’ve mostly not be exposed to. Great review, Valerie!

    • Ivalleria April 22, 2016 at 12:13 am #

      Thanks!

      I find it easy to relate to a person wanting to be the opposite gender, and also easy to relate to the idea of a person wanting to be gender ambiguous. I saw a really cute person on the train today who was born a woman but styled very male and this person was beautiful, or handsome, or just hot, idk. But I’m also intellectually and personally attached to categories of “man” and “woman” continuing to have meaning (ever-shifting, sure) and being relevant. Which I don’t always feel like trans activism allows for.

      On the point about the struggles of trans people who don’t have the resources necessarily to pass…that actually brings me to my deepest discomfort with the whole thing, which is the nascent trans community’s reliance on the medical establishment and Big Pharma. I read Testo Junkie, where BP takes off-label hormones as a rebellion, and you’re like OK, but that money is still going into Big Pharma’s pockets somewhere. It seems kind of laughable to me that this new supposedly culture-challenging rebellion is also a brilliant way to make a fortune for drug companies. Do we think any of the white men buying new planes are upset about how trans-people rock their patriarchy? Not likely when trans-people are such a lucrative new source of funds.

      It would make me happy if people were able to grass-roots express and redefine gender as they liked, without the kind of stigma you’re talking about where “you just look weird unless you go all the way.” So the choice to spend the money and take the drugs could be right for some people, but not for everyone.

      Read it and tell us what you think!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: